Web → On the warpath Insglas 3 Oct 2012, 13:14 # What I mean was actually that if you talk about 100 million active users, we should have figures only nine times smaller than thos on Facebook. It means essentially that at the same activity rate we would've had about 20 +1's for teh first article, 15 +1's for the second article and 7 +1's for the third article. It becomes obvious that the so-called active Google+ users are at least twice less active as the folks on Facebook, which doesn't make that much sense to my mind. Moreover, there can be no gap between FB and G+, since pretty much everybody has an account on Facebook, so the company just has nowhere to grow in user numbers. If G+ ever reaches these values, it will slow down just the same way F+ did it this year. P.S. 'Less than 2 years of working Google+ social network has about 100 million users a month. And it's only active users. If the things go on with the same speed there will be a great gap between FB and G+.' So much for 'There is nothing about the present statistics.'